Scientology v. Armstrong

Dear Mark:

I’m writing to you at this time, initially anyway, to see where you’re at on your August 13, 1991 declaration that was filed in the first Scientology v. Armstrong case appeal, and to see if you’ll do something about what you stated in this dec.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/appeal/decl-rathbun-1991-08-13.html

I’m sure you’re knowledgeable about many of the years of attacks on me while you were working under David Miscavige. But right now I just want to address your August 13, 1991 dec. While I’m at it, because DM is steamed and some of his Scientologists or ops have been communicating particularly insanely recently about Hubbard’s Admissions or Affirmations, I’ll also take this opportunity to ask whether DM ever let you read them.

I’m communicating to you about your dec after all these years because of your recent statements on your website and on ESMB. You offered to help those in need who once formally participated in Scientology but who now hold no hope nor intention of ever seeking help from that organization. That’s me to a T.

I’m going to St. Petersburg, Russia to participate in a conference May 15 and 16 on “Destructive Cults and Human Rights” organized by FECRIS, the European Federation of Centers for Research and Information on Sectarianism. My paper, which will be published after the conference, is entitled “Scientology, the Dangerous Environment Racket.” The term “dangerous environment” comes from cult founder L. Ron Hubbard, appears many times in Scientology “scripture,” and is a key concept in the “Suppressive Person” doctrine. The conference is a great education and media opportunity, and will forge and strengthen North American-European-Russian alliances on the cult fronts.

From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Gerry Armstrong and his Affirmations – An analysis
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:15:37 -0800